5G, EMF & Wireless Radiation
A comprehensive list of cities, towns, councils & countries that have banned 5G:
Millimeter Wave testing on rats in 1977:
Link to the above video:
Some recent studies on the biological effects of RF radiation you can send your city councils when you are fighting 5G:
Studies & Links showing biological harm:
● US Navy Report (1971) – Naval Medical Research Institute – Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (‘Effects’) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation
● Blood Brain Barrier – The first study was conducted by Dr. Allan Frey (1975) (who already proved the “Auditory Effect” / “Frey Effect” of non-thermal Microwave Radiation) – The study found that (1) non-thermal levels of microwave radiation can break the blood brain barrier (BBB) (2) the main cause of the adverse effects are from the modulation rather than the carrier wave - Neural function and behavior: defining the relationship. The Swedish Neuro-Scientist, Dr. Lai Salford confirmed Frey's study regarding the BBB. He conducted further studies on the various effects of this radiation on the brain. Summary by Arthur Firstenberg from Cellular Phone Task Force about Salford's work and link to his studies.
● Bioinitiative Report (2012) - The Bioinitiative report is the most comprehensive review of studies on biological effects caused by EMFs. It was prepared by 30 world-leading scientists and public health professionals. The authors reviewed 3000 peer reviewed studies on EMF's, including about 1,800 on the effects of wireless radiation. Their conclusion: "Bio-effects can also occur from just minutes of exposure to mobile phone masts (cell towers), Wi-Fi, and wireless utility ‘smart’ meters that produce whole-body exposure". – Color Charts of Sample Studies of Reported Biological Effects from Radiofrequency Radiation at Low- Intensity Exposures.
● Oxidative Stress Mechanism – Meta Analysis Paper - Yakymenko (2015) – This analysis shows that 93 out of 100 studies show wireless radiation causes oxidative stress, a mechanism that can lead to cancer, non-cancer diseases, and DNA damage. This study disproves the wireless industry’s misleading statements that there are no mechanisms by which non-thermal levels of wireless radiation can affect the body. It also disproves the industry contentions that "the overwhelming majority of studies show no effects". Oxidative Mechanisms of Biological Activity of Low-Intensity Radiofrequency Radiation
● Increase in Glucose Metabolism - National Institute of Health (NIH) Study - Volkow (2011) - This study shows conclusive evidence of the bio-effects of wireless radiation on the human brain. Effects of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Signal Exposure on Brain Glucose Metabolism
● NTP Study – On Nov. 1 2018, the final report of the results of the $30 million 14-year study of the National Toxicology Program (NTP) of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) was published and determined the study showed CLEAR EVIDENCE that cell phones cause cancer and breaks the DNA.
This is the biggest study of its kind. A peer review panel of 11 scientists confirmed the findings of "clear evidence" on March 28, 2018. Read about the study on SaferEMR.com Website: National Toxicology Program Finds Cell Phone Radiation Causes Cancer. We now have the government study that proves beyond a doubt the harm of wireless technology and it should be a game changer. The public must be warned and protected.
Dr. Ron Melnik, PhD, Senior Toxicologist and Director of Special Programs in the (NIEHS), who lead the study until he retired, said in 2016: "The NTP tested the hypothesis that cell phone radiation could not cause health effects and that hypothesis has now been disproved. The experiment has been done and, after extensive reviews, the consensus is that there was a carcinogenic effect”. In regard to the DNA damage findings, Dr. Melnik stated that the results of the study: “should put to rest the old argument that RF radiation cannot cause DNA damage”.
● The Ramazzini Study – The Ramazinni study is a 6 million Euro study conducted by the Ramazzinin Institute in Italy. The study is similar to the NTP study with one major difference – while the NTP study used levels of radiation similar to those emitted from a cell phone, the Ramazzini used levels of radiation 6,000 times lower, which are more like the levels of radiation we get from further away cell towers. The results were the same as the results of the NTP.
● Microwave Sickness – Belyaev et al (2016) - EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 For the Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of EMF-Related Health Problems and Illnesses. Microwave Sickness is the more accurate name for electro-sensitivity (ES). It is the most widespread manifestation of illness from wireless radiation with mainly neurological symptoms. At least 10% of the population has already developed the condition; the rates are likely much higher. In 2016, the EMF working group of the European Academy for Environmental Medicine (EUROPAEM) published guidelines, which include a review of the science of Electro-Sensitivity and instructions for doctors on how to diagnose and treat ES. It is important to know that Microwave Sickness is Recognized under the ICD-10 as ‘Radiation Sickness’ and was acknowledged by various government agencies as a disability.
● Cancer in Children- American Brain Tumor Association - Ostrom (2015) – This report shows that the 4 leadings diseases that kill children and young adults are brain tumors, thyroid cancer, testis cancer and rectal cancer – cancer in proximity to where wireless devices are carried/used. Adolescent and Young Adult Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Read about the school in Ripon CA in which 6 children and 3 teachers developed cancer after a “small cell” antenna was installed in the school.
● Cancer from Cell Towers – Meta Analysis Paper- Yakymenko et al (2011) – a good summary of studies including army and air-force studies that show wireless radiation from cell towers and radars have severe adverse effects. This is a good study to explain to legislators why we should not allow 5G towers near our homes or children's schools. Long-Term Exposure to Microwave Radiation Provokes Cancer Growth: Evidences From Radars and Mobile Communication Systems
● Courts Find Causation Between Cell Phones & Brain Tumors - Fifth Court in Italy Ruled Cell Phones Cause Brain Tumors and Determined It Is An Occupational Disease
● Reduced Sperm Count - Zilberlicht (2015) - Dozens of studies prove beyond a doubt that wireless radiation adversely affects the sperm. - Habits of cell phone usage and sperm quality - does this warrant attention?
● Autism – Prof. Martha Herbert MD. PhD is a pediatric Neurologist from Harvard University who specializes in autism. After exploring the potential correlation between the exponential increase in the rates of children with autism to the exponential increase in our exposure to electromagnetic fields and radiation from wireless, she concludes that there is a likely correlation - Autism and EMF? Plausibility of a pathophysiological link – Part I; Part 2. She is now convinced that there are established non-thermal effects from wireless radiation and is a strong advocate against WiFi in schools. Press Here for her letter on this issue.
● ADD – Prof. Hugh Taylor (2012) Yale University – The study showed that when pregnant mice were exposed to microwave radiation, it caused changes in the brains of their babies and behavior that resembled ADHD. Fetal Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure From 800- 1900 Mhz-Rated Cellular Telephones Affects Neurodevelopment and Behavior in Mice. Press HERE for Prof. Taylor video presentation.
● Wi-Fi - New meta-analysis paper by Prof. Martin Pall (2018) – The paper summarizes the various health effects found to be caused by WiFi. Wi-Fi is an important threat to human health.
The Wireless Fraud
● The Nation Article – excellent article that was published on 3/29/18, about the wireless industry fraud/cover up titled: " How Big Wireless Made Us Think That Cell Phones Are Safe: A Special Investigation" and the subtitle: The disinformation campaign—and massive radiation increase - behind the 5G rollout." The article is especially important as it was written by two leading investigative journalists -
FCC – Captured Agency - Harvard University Center for Ethics (2015)- Captured Agency: How the FCC is Dominated by the Industries It Presumably Regulates. Summary of relevant points from the report regarding the FCC & the wireless industry from SaferEMR.com - An Exposé of the FCC: An Agency Captured by the Industries it Regulates
Mark Hertzgaard and Mark Dowie. Dowie
is a former publisher and editor of Mother Jones and has won nineteen journalism awards.
Impact on the Environment
● Bees Birds and Mankind - A very interesting report from a leading German scientist about the effects of wireless radiation on bees, birds and humans. Ulrich Warnke (2009) – Bees, Birds and Mankind - Destroying Nature by ‘Electrosmog’
● A good introductory article about 5G health effects - Dr. Cindy Russell (2017) - A 5G
Wireless Future – Will It Give Us a Smart Nation or Contribute to an Unhealthy One?
● 5G Appeal - Appeal of 240 scientists from 31 countries who published over 2,000 studies on EMF effects calling for a moratorium on 5G because the harms are proven and because an epidemic of sickness already exists. Ignoring it is a price society can no longer pay.
● Impact of 5G on Energy Consumption - 5G use will increase energy costs: study
● 5G in Congress - Senator Blumenthal’s Actions to Expose the Lie About the FCC claim that 5G is safe - Finally, Health Effects Were Mentioned in 5G Senate Commerce Committee Hearing
● “Database of Studies” – A website which is managed by a German hospital and funded by the German government and industry. Likely the most comprehensive database of studies on the issue of electromagnetic fields and radiation (both studies that found effects and studies that didn’t find effects), a total of about 30,000 studies.
California Specific Information
● California Medical Association (CMA) Resolution on Wireless Standards Reevaluation (2014) Resolution 107- 14 - The California Medical Association passed a resolution stating that our current safety standards are not adequate to protect public health and need to be revised to take into account non-thermal biological effect. Its resolve states: "CMA support efforts to implement new safety exposure limits for wireless devices to levels that do not cause human or environmental harm based on scientific research." In this resolution CMA acknowledges that “... peer reviewed research has demonstrated adverse biological effects of wireless EMF including single and double stranded DNA breaks, creation of reactive oxygen species, immune dysfunction, cognitive processing effects, stress protein synthesis in the brain, altered brain development, sleep and memory disturbances, ADHD, abnormal behavior, sperm dysfunction, and brain tumors...” CA Medical Association is the only medical association that passed such a resolution.
● LA Firefighters & Cell Towers - in 2005, The International Firefighters Union, representing over 300,000 firefighters recognized wireless microwave radiation health effects and has stood strongly against locating cell towers on top of their fire stations; 28 page International Association of Fire Fighters Resolution detailing health effects associated with exposure to wireless microwave radiation and reported symptoms of their exposed firefighters. The document states numerous health effects were found to be caused by wireless radiation. The resolution was a result of complaints by firefighters of headaches, memory problems, sleeping problems, anxiety following the installation of cell towers at their fire stations. Brain scans of the firefighters in 2005 showed abnormalities. The results of these abnormal brain scans were summarized in a letter written to the FCC in 2013. California Assembly Bill AB57, which passed on October 9, 2015, exempts fire stations from having transmitting devices on their facilities. The 5G Bill SB 649 which was vetoed by Governor Brown included an exemption for firefighters.
● Medical Studies From CA: Divan (2010) – "Cell Phone Use and Behavioral Problems in Young Children" - Two of the top universities in California, UCLA along with USC, completed an National Institute of Health (NIH) funded study showing that pregnant women using cell phones had children with more behavioral problems. This was a repeat of a study previously done in Europe, showing its validity. Another recently published study was done on 83,000 women showing the same results.
● CA Department of Public Health (CDPH) Cell Phone Safety Guidelines (2017) - In December 2017, the California Department of Public Health became the first US State Department of Health to publish guidelines on how to reduce exposure to radiofrequency from cell phones cell phones. However, sadly the story behind the publication of the guidelines exposes the outrageous failure of those entrusted to protect our health, likely because of fear of industry. In 2014 Dr. Joel Moskowitz, Director of the Center for Family and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, submitted 3 requests to the CDPH under the California Public Records Act for this information. All three requests were denied. In 2016, the UC Berkeley School of Law, Environmental Law Clinic and the First Amendment Project filed a lawsuit on his behalf in the Sacramento Superior Court. On May 12, 2017, CA Attorney General’s office released the drafts. Shockingly it was discovered that since 2009 and until 2015, the California Department of Public Health prepared 27 versions of a cell phone radiation safety fact sheet but never released them to the public. In December 2017 it officially published the guidelines. Needless to say the guidelines are inadequate, full of fear of telling the truth and also give bad advice such as encouraging the use of bluetooth headphone. The story was covered by the San Francisco Chronicles “New records show how state reworked secret cell phone warnings”
● Purchasing a Meter to Measure Wireless Radiation - There are various meters on the market. Each has advantages and disadvantageous. My personal favorite is Cornet ED88T Plus. I like it because it is small and easy to carry everywhere. It also has the most features - lights, sound, graph, it shows the frequency and measures not only the radiation from wireless devices but also the electric and magnetic fields of the house electricity (low frequencies). It is the best value for the money and quite accurate. Other popular meters are the Acoustimeter and the Trifield. PLEASE do not buy the meter on Amazon but rather from activists who have also a side business of selling such products to help support their efforts. For example - you can buy from Josh Hart at StopSmartMeters.Org. Josh has led the movement against smart meters and he is also in California. If you mention my name he will give you a discount. Another website of an activist who is doing a great job is 4EHSbyEHS.com.
The Epoch Times is the paper with the highest distribution in the world and is being published in 26 languages. It is a NYC based newspaper. The paper has been publishing many articles about the topic. The articles are very well researched.
● Article About 5G - “Resistance to 5G: Roadblock to a High Tech Future or Warning of a Serious Health Risk?”
● Article About Wi-Fi in Schools - “Wi-Fi in Schools: Experimenting With The Next Generation”
● Article About Microwave Sickness - “Tuning in to Microwave Sickness - How wireless
● “Generation Zapped”– An introductory movie to the issue of wireless health effects.
● "Microwaves, Science & Lies”– A movie about the wireless fraud including in the World
● Resonance – Beings of Frequency (free) – A movie about how wireless is affecting us,
considering humans are electric beings.
● Take Back Your Power – A movie mainly about wireless "smart" meter fraud and harms.
technology can trigger a devastating illness
● Invisible Rainbow – A History of Electricity and Life – By Arthur Firstenberg
● Disconnect – The Truth About Cell Phone Radiation, What the Industry Has Done to Hide it
and How to Protect Your Family – By Dr. Devra Davis
● Overpowered - By Dr. Martin Blank
Contacts / Organizations in CA
● Center for Electrosmog Prevention – Led by Sue Brinchman who is doing fantastic job and
focuses on the San Diego area. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
● EMF Safety Network – Led by Sandi Mauer from Marin County. Email:
● We Are The Evidence – Advocacy group that represent the many adults and children who have become sick by wireless technology radiation. We are not an organization that focuses on maintaining an information heavy website as we are more focused on the actual, on the ground work educating elected officials, getting accommodation for the injured, being involved in legal actions, and helping communities.
● Safer EMR - Scientific and policy developments regarding the health effects of electromagnetic radiation exposure by Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., Director, Center for Family and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley
● Americans for Responsible Technology - A Coalition of organizations, including We Are The Evidence, that is lead by seasoned environmental advocates Patti & Doug Wood. They are now leading the on-the-ground movement. They provide great resources for activists and organized the 5G Crisis Day of Action that took place on May 15. They are doing a fantastic job!
● WhatIs5G.info – Covers the various issues associated with 5G including health, environmental issues, privacy, cyber security, e-waste, and more.
● Scientists for Wired Technology & My Street My Choice - Focuses on how to stop 5G
transmitters in front of our homes - by Paul McGavin from Marin County, CA.
● Environmental Health Trust – Organization and led by Dr. Devra Davis, focuses on providing
online information on various aspects of wireless harms.
● Microwave News – For over 35 years Microwave News has been the leader reporting on the
potential health and environmental impacts of electromagnetic fields and radiation.
The current wireless system (2G, 3G, and 4G) has already proven to cause DNA breakage & is without a doubt carcinogenic- via a plethora of legitimate peer-reviewed scientific literature- BEFORE the rollout of 5g which will be at a much higher frequency using millimeter waves.
The military uses millimeter waves to disperse crowds at 95 Ghz (Active Denial System).
Below are a couple links to & the first page of a 1977 study on millimeter waves called, “Biological Effects of Millimeter Radiowaves” that was declassified by the CIA in 2012:
Millimeter waves affected & damaged the skin, nerves, brain, heart, bone marrow, kidney, liver & spleen & damaged the mitochondria (the “powerhouses” of cells).
This is clear evidence you can present to your city councils.
5G will be at 24-90 GHz, but will also operate under lower frequencies & utilize the current 2G/3G/4G system.
The National Toxicology Program (NTP) concluded in two final reports released November 1, 2018 that there is clear evidence that male rats exposed to high levels of radio frequency radiation (RFR) like that used in 2G and 3G cell phones developed cancerous heart and brain tumors- these areas in humans are where most keep or rest their cellphones.
The NTP conducted toxicology studies in rats and mice to help clarify potential health hazards, including cancer risk, from exposure to RFR like that used in 2G and 3G cell phones which operate within a range of frequencies from about 700 – 2700 megahertz (MHz).
What did the studies find?
The NTP studies found that high exposure to RFR (900 MHz) used by cell phones was associated with:
- Clear evidence of tumors in the hearts of male rats. The tumors were malignant schwannomas.
- Some evidence of tumors in the brains of male rats. The tumors were malignant gliomas.
- Some evidence of tumors in the adrenal glands of male rats. The tumors were benign, malignant, or complex combined pheochromocytoma.
“We believe that the link between radio frequency radiation and tumors in male rats is real, and the external experts agreed,” said Bucher.
The $30 million NTP studies took more than 10 years to complete and are the most comprehensive assessment, to date, of health effects in animals exposed to RFR with modulations used in 2G and 3G cell phones. 2G and 3G networks were standard when the studies were designed and are still used for phone calls and texting.
The final conclusions represent the consensus between NTP and a panel of external scientific experts who thoroughly peer-reviewed the draft NTP technical reports at a public meeting in March 2018.
The results are based on NTP’s four categories of evidence that a substance may cause cancer: clear evidence (highest), some evidence, equivocal evidence, no evidence (lowest).
Work on maintaining local control in your area! Speak at city council meetings, develop relationships with your council members. Email them with studies, facts & literature about the current carcinogenic system & 5G. Build up your local tribe; find other local activists, network, share ideas & work together. There is strength in numbers.
Know, your council members will tell you they have no local control due to the 1996 Telecommunications Act, that their hands are tied & it’s a federal issue. This is not completely true.
To incommode is defined as “to disturb”.
The towers may be disallowed if they "generate noise, cause negative health consequences or create safety concerns.
All these impacts could disturb public road use, or disturb quiet enjoyment.
This recent California Supreme Court decision, along with section 7901 of the public utilities code, are clear evidence that our cities have local control.
In California, cities Hillsborough, Piedmont and Danville have outright banned 5G. They're now being sued by Verizon, but they may win, and may set huge precedents.
Many other cities are enacting revised telecommunications ordinances that have specs that:
• prohibit small–cell installations on city–owned poles.
• prohibit new or updated small cell facilities in residential zones.
• allow towers on electrical utility poles only in mixed–use commercial zones.
• facilities installed on poles in public rights of way must be 1500 feet apart.
Present & email all of this to your council members and make it clear to them that cities & jurisdictions all over the world are restricting, regulating or banning 5G.
Start with sending out a “Legal Notice of Liability” to your elected representatives!
This notice gets sent out automatically & officially puts your local and state politicians on notice for Liability should they not do what’s in their power to protect you!
Go to this link below (Copy then paste into your browser:)
The page will look like this:
Click take action, then the next page should look like this:
After completing the form it sends the NOL automatically!
Continue to hammer away at your local representatives about approving an urgency ordinance to keep small cells out of neighborhoods and out of your town!
Watch these videos above 👆🏽to better innerstand the health impacts, and the connections between 5g, technocracy, artificial intelligence, trans-humanism & total control & Orwellian surveillance!
Anyone informed and educated on the effects of densified 4G and 5G infrastructure to safety, privacy and property values is opposed to this rollout.
“THE INTERNATIONAL APPEAL”-
More than 230 scientists from 41 countries have expressed their “serious concerns” regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices already before the additional 5G roll-out. They refer to the fact that ”numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines”. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plants and animals.
After the scientists’ appeal was written in 2015 additional research has convincingly confirmed serious health risks from RF-EMF fields from wireless technology. The world’s largest study (25 million US dollar) National Toxicology Program (NTP), shows statistically significant increase in the incidence of brain and heart cancer in animals exposed to EMF below the ICNIRP guidelines followed by most countries. These results support results in human epidemiological studies on RF radiation and brain tumour risk. A large number of peer-reviewed scientific reports demonstrate harm to human health from EMFs.
(International Commission on Non-Ionizing The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the cancer agency of the World Health Organization (WHO), in 2011 concluded that EMFs of frequencies 30 KHz – 300 GHz are possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B).
Follow me on IG: @theorgonizedearth
Go to & review the highlights, “Kill 5g”, & “Fight 5g” for sources & knowledge on how we stop this rollout!